Arc'teryx Veilance Fall 2011
Images
—01. Insulated Shell Jacket.
—02. Field Jacket SV.
—03. Hooded Wool Jacket.
—04. Insulated Field Jacket.
Words
"Just as Arc’teryx redefined outerwear for extreme conditions with absolute dedication and technical innovation, their Veilance line channels that same groundbreaking spirit with added elegance for an urban environment to elevate expectations of what men’s apparel can be. For Fall 2011, warm but unobtrusive linings are present in a selection of outerwear designs. Silhouettes in the collection remain progressive, supported by advanced materials and intelligent fabrications."
It's rare to be able to stand behind a product unequivocally, but in my opinion, Veilance is that kind of product. It is expensive, but it's also the absolute pinnacle of modern technical outerwear, and once you've worn one of these pieces, particularly in adverse weather, it's difficult to consider anything else.
Reader Comments (12)
However I don't like it. I also think calling it "the absolute pinnacle of modern technical outerwear" is misguided, and simply incorrect. See innovations by Berghaus, Kalttermusen, Tilak, and even Patagonia for that.
Should also note, my dislike of it has nothing to do with its price, and everything to do with the design, and the material choices, and how they DON"T work together.
I have an M65 and a gore-tex pro shell. I don't need or want a gore-tex pro shell M65.
luckily for Arc'teryx, I imagine their is someone with a hefty disposable income who does.
When are 'urban' demands greater than that of the great outdoors?
And if I'm paying for the 'tailoring' and 'design' then i could find a hundred jackets that all look cooler than these.
I think the price point reflects what suckers are willing to pay. When in comes to the true performance gear they know mountaineers and outdoors folk won't pay it, so they don't charge it.
It saddens me. Some brands are getting VERY greedy. I include the likes of Nigel Cabourn (which I still love, but won't ever pay full price for), t(s), and Visvim amongst them. The mark up is INSANE.
I don't buy it.
Personally I'm not into these by Asterisk Valance (what a bloody stupid name) except when they're in interesting colours as in previous seasons. That clay red and that unusual shade of yellow for instance were really nice. I also feel like they still have an air of MacBook-esque nerdiness about them. Jonathan Ive swag! I bet they're fantastic in real life though, and way better than Visvim in any case!
Obviously you are entitled to your opinion, but I would argue that at least Tilak and Klattermusen are far more interesting on LOOKS alone, never mind their innovative performance features. And I'm far from one of those "why buy this dumb 900 dollar jacket when the northface makes a great rain shell for 99 dollars" idiots either. I appreciate interesting and unorthodox applications of Tech-fabrics when they WORK well with the design.
In my opinion this stuff just doesn't. Unless you really need a gore-tex that doesn't clash with your briefcase. But I don't live that life.
You can argue that it's too much for a gore tex, but I'm sure that Arc doesn't make a lot of money at all on these. It's more like something very specific that appeals to a certain niche of rich maniacs, kind of like the visvim fans.
If most of your wardrobe consists of like Margaret Howell and Alden it's really easy to incorporate Arcteryx Veilance. This simply isn't the case with Tilak and Klattermusen. Also isn't the case with Acronym. This is in part due to offputting branding, but mainly due to the fits.